Skip to content

Archive for November 20th, 2012

Wales — Cheers and Applause from Public as Plans for Wind Farm Rejected

Graeme Wilki — This is South Wales — November 20, 2012

THERE were cheers and applause from the public gallery as plans for 21 wind turbines in Carmarthenshire were rejected by councillors this afternoon.

The planning committee refused to give energy company Renewable Energy Systems (RES) Ltd permission to build on Mynydd Llanllwni, in north east Carmarthenshire.

It remains to be seen if RES will now appeal to the Welsh Assembly against the decision.

Speaking in County Hall in Carmarthen, where members of the public packed the gallery, Llanfihangel ar Arth county councillor Linda Evans said: “Obviously, developments of this nature will have a long term effect on the lives of people in the area. The landscape will be destroyed forever. Please do not destroy our heritage.”

The committee heard from a range of protestors including David Ablett, from Llanllwni, who said it would endanger birds on the moorland.

He said: “The placing of turbines on the mountain will massacre these beautiful species and the noise of the skylark will be drowned out by the noise of these turbines.”

Other objections related to people using horses on the common land, the negative effect on tourism, damage to the ecology of the area and health problems.

Ted Marynicz, of Grwp Blaengwen, said he represented people suffering from noise from the existing nearby Alltwalis Wind Farm.

“We do not need to rely on suspect computer models to tell you how much noise these turbines make,” he said.

” We hear them every day.”

(To continue reading, click here)

Amherst Island anti-wind group sends letter to Minister of Natural Resources

Peter Hendra — The Whig — November 20, 2012

KINGSTON – A group that opposes the proposed building of wind turbines on Amherst Island hopes a letter to the provincial government will discourage it from approving a wind project planned for the island.

Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp., through its subsidiary Windlectric Inc., is planning to erect 33 to 37 wind turbines on the island, each of which would stand 50 storeys high, that would generate 75 megawatts. The project is awaiting approval from the Ontario government.

In a letter dated Nov. 15, Peter Large, president of the Association to Protect Amherst Island, states that the “unique, bio-diverse” island wouldn’t be a suitable for an “industrial-scale wind-turbine complex” because it is, among other reasons, an important migration stop for a variety of endangered birds.

“We now know a lot more about the biodiversity of the island, how important it is for migrating birds, how significant it is internationally… but some of the things have been brought to light by, quite frankly, objective, professional research,” he said in an interview.

Large said that he is aware of “an independent” study being conducted by a well-known ornithologist is almost finished.

“It was important, I think, apart from people just feeling good or not good about the island, to actually take a science-based approach to anything we say about why turbines should not go here,” he explained.

Amherst Island, Large wrote, is an internationally known Important Bird Area, and is not just a haven for migratory birds, but also bird watchers.

“The government, I think, has to value… that the island is a credit to the province in its current state,” he said. “People come here by the hundreds just for this.”

(To continue reading, click here)

Windfarm scandal in Denmark –(The hits just keeps pouring in about Denmark wind industry!)

From EPAW — released October 29, 2012

 An article in the Danish press reveals a scandal that is shaking the government (1).

The Minister of the Environment has been pretending all along that his country’s regulations about noise emitted by wind turbines are the most restrictive in the world. Yet this month he explained that 4 to 11% of neighbors would be annoyed by the characteristic pulsing sound from wind turbines, of which up to a thousand more will be imposed on the saturated Danish countryside.

The European Platform Against Windfarms (EPAW) and the Waubra Foundation (Australia) denounce this disregard for human rights to health. Across the world, they warn, thousands of wind turbine neighbors can’t get enough sleep at night on account of noise and/or infrasound, and this includes many children. Inevitably, it leads to health problems, which are getting worse with length of exposure.

“Has any country, in the European Union or anywhere, the right to sacrifice the health of part of its population? ” asks Mark Duchamp, Executive Director of EPAW.

What is more, world-renowned Danish acoustician professor Henrik Moeller, from the prestigious Aarlborg University, has once again come out criticizing his government on the issue. He had already done so a year ago, when he denounced important irregularities in the establishment of norms concerning the low-frequency noise levels of wind turbines (2).

This time around, he is accusing the Minister of the Environment of being shy of reality with his figures of 4 – 11%. According to the professor’s estimates, 22 to 42% of the neighbors will be significantly affected by wind turbines, day or night (1).

The percentage is huge, and the scandal is becoming ever so more difficult to ignore, comments Mark Duchamp.

“This disregard for the health of the Danish people will have far-reaching consequences”, opines Mauri Johansson, MD, MHH, Specialist in community and occupational medicine in Denmark, “because many countries copy our regulations when it comes to frequencies emitted by wind turbines. Governments around the world will continue to allow these machines much too close to habitations, and the number of people affected in their health will keep growing, not only with the length of exposure as years go by, but with the number of wind turbines installed, which continues to grow rapidly.”

(To continue reading, click here)

Australia — wind farm opponents threaten renewable energy targets

Business Spectator — November 20, 2012

One of Australia’s largest energy companies, EnergyAustralia, has raised concerns with the Climate Change Authority that wind farms may already be at their saturation point in terms of community acceptance, despite a need to triple the number of wind farms being built to meet the government’s renewable energy target, according to The Australian.

The company told the authority that the average of 300 megawatts of wind farms installed each year is “already testing the limits of community acceptance”, according toThe Australian, but that the construction rate for large-scale renewable projects would have to increase to about 930 megawatts a year to meet the mandatory 2020 target.

EnergyAustralia went on to warn that there is a “high” risk with such a rapid roll-out that if projects are not installed quickly enough, consumer may be stuck paying a penalty, adding that “the social licence” does not exist to allow the construction of wind farms to ramp-up so rapidly.

The feedback from EnergyAustralia comes close on the heels of comments by Origin Energy that community backlash over wind farms is exceeding opposition to coal-seam gas mining.

“We get more letters of complaint today from local communities and interest groups about wind farm development than we do about coal-seem gas,” Origin Energy executive general manager of corporate affairs Phil Craig said, according to The Australian.
(To continue reading, click here)

When lies and deceit no longer work for the wind industry, they turn to bribes

Louise Gray — Environment Correspondent — The Telegraph — November 19, 2012

£150 for wind farm community – as long as you live within 1.5 miles

Residents living close to a wind farm will be given up to £150 off their energy bill in the first deal of its kind – but only if they live within a mile and a half.

Good Energy are offering 400 homes within 1.5 miles (2km) of Delabole wind farm in Cornwall a £100 discount if they sign up to a deal with the green supplier.

If the development, made up of four 300ft high turbines, makes more money because the wind blows the discount could be up to £150.

The company hope to roll out the idea across the country as they build more wind farms and encourage other developers to also offer a “local electricity tariff” for communities affected by renewable energy infrastructure.

The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) is currently looking at the idea as part of a range of financial incentives to encourage more communities to accept wind farms.

There are currently more than 3,000 onshore turbines in the UK, with a further 6,000 in planning.

But critics dismissed the idea as a ‘bribe’ that will not help people beyond 2km from the wind farm who feel their view has been ruined.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has warned the Government against promoting a system in which communities are “paid off” to secure planning permission.

(To continue reading, click here)

James Delingpole — Big Wind: The most corrupt and corrupting industry in the world

James Delingpole – The Telegraph — November 19, 2012

There’s an excellent article in the Copenhagen Post which I’m going to reprint here in full. It’s by a retired high court judge called Peter Rørdam. I’m reprinting it because apart from the place names, every last detail applies to the UK wind industry too. And – from what I’ve seen personally – the Australian one. And the US and Canadian ones as well.

The reason the industry is so corrupt is quite simply that without the lies it tells as a matter of course and without the cosy stitch-ups it arranges with regulators and politicians at taxpayers’ expense, it simply would not exist. Take the noise regulations which are currently the subject of an enquiry by the Institute of Acoustics. The reason these noise regulations so badly need re-examining is that the original parameters for noise limits were set by people working for the wind industry with a vested interest in making it as easy as possible for wind farms to be built in as many places as possible. They make no allowance whatsoever for the damage to human health now known to be caused by Low Frequency Noise which – hey guess, what? – isn’t even measured by the tame acoustics experts who work on behalf of the wind developers because the system has been rigged so they don’t have to.

It’s entirely possible that this corrupt system will continue to be rigged with the connivance of politicians. A report in today’s Telegraph suggests that the green activists who staff DECC may have fixed in advance the results of a new enquiry by the Institute of Acoustics by setting it worthless parameters.

Richard Perkins, Vice President of the Institute of Acoustics and chairman of the working group looking at the guidance, insisted the new guidance would tighten up the rules so that only wind farms in the right places are given planning permission.

He said current noise levels are a matter for the Government, and were outside the working group’s terms of reference.

In other words, it looks like this enquiry has been asked to overlook the very area which it should be studying most closely.

If this sounds like the kind of shabby behaviour you’d more closely associate with communist states and third world kleptocracies than sophisticated Western economies, think again. It’s rife across the Western world, as this article by a former Danish high court judge illustrates.

It’s a widely held conception that Denmark is one of the world’s least corrupt countries. The message is always warmly received, but this isn’t the same as saying that Denmark is free of corruption.

I’m not qualified to speak about corruption in general, but there is one area in which I do have an in-depth knowledge: wind power – which is an industry that has managed to thoroughly corrupt the political system.

The law approving construction of a test centre of large land-based wind turbines near the Jutland town of Østerild was forced through parliament despite warnings about the effects it would have on the natural environment in the area and its impact on residents. The bill was able to make its way through parliament thanks to a complete manipulation of the facts – both by keeping some information under wraps, and by directly misinforming people.

But it wasn’t parliament that was misled. Members of parliament that voted for the law were fully aware of the truth, yet they turned a blind eye so the law could be passed. It was, in fact, voters who were tricked into thinking that they had been told the whole truth.

The only thing that matters for wind turbine makers is money. You can wonder why law makers would play along with their game, but as soon as they threatened to move jobs abroad they did as they were told.

Laying out all the details of this sitation would require more space than is available here, but for those that read Danish, Peter Skeel Hjort’s book ‘Besat af wind’ (Obsessed by the wind) provides a harrowing look into of the industry and the political system.

Collaboration between the industry and lawmakers didn’t stop with the approval of the test centre. Since then, there has been a flood of complaints from people who were unfortunate enough to find themselves living next to large land-based wind turbines elsewhere. The effects, which are well documented, can cause illness and render properties uninhabitable. Their complaints, however, are normally rejected by the authorities, who maintain that living close to wind turbines is not associated with any detrimental effects.

On October 9, Berlingske newspaper published an article by three Aalborg University scientists, who proved that the official noise calculations are wrong, and that the manipulated figures tone down the problems associated with living near a wind turbine. The authorities have done nothing to show that they have scientific evidence to base their claims on. Their only reaction has been to say that the Aalborg University study is wrong, because it does not jibe with the wind power industry’s own findings. We heard this most recently from the environment minister, Ida Auken, who is either being led around by the nose of the people whose interests she’s looking out for, or – as was the case with her predecessor – she is taking part in the misinformation.

It’s worth noting that the compensation homeowners living near wind turbines are given to make up for lost property value is based the falsified noise calculations – which means that people are, in fact, being cheated out of the full amount they are actually owed.

Corruption is defined as moral decay, and that is precisely what we are witnessing here. The fear that Denmark could lose jobs and the near religious obsession with wind power has made politicians deaf and blind to objections to wind as a source of energy, and led them to take part in the industry’s fraud. The environmental and human impacts of what they are doing appear to have no effect on them.

It only adds to the embarrassment is that instead of hiring people, the wind industry is eliminating jobs in Denmark. Meanwhile, little has happened at the Østerild test centre. Parliament rushed to approve the establishment of Østerild, because the industry told them it was vital that they could have seven large wind turbines standing in a row. Østerild was chosen because it had the physical characteristics the industry needed. Today, one turbine stands, and it remains to be seen how many more will be built.

There are a lot of people who have plenty to be ashamed of, but we shouldn’t expect that to change much. Moral scruples aren’t what we most associate with Danish politicians.

 

The Myth of Denmark as a Corruption-free Country