About the Post

Author Information

U.S. — Wind power numbers just don’t add up. ‘Wind companies getting by with murder’

(Editor’s note: As in the case of most statistics spouted by wind proponents, when you put them under the microscope, they quickly fall apart. — DQ)

David Baumann — Berkshire Eagle — July 29, 2012

Sugarland Wind has received local approval to construct a 200 million watt (megawatt) electrical generating wind farm in Florida’s Everglades.  They state that “the 113 turbines will produce clean domestic energy for up to 60,000 homes.”  this is a nice neat quotable statement that has been picked up by every local media outlet in South Florida.

In east central Wyoming, near Casper, Duke energy recently completed construction of the Top of the World farm, a 110-turbine 200-mega watt wind farm.  This is exactly the number of turbines and total capacity of the Florida Everglades project.  Copied right out of their own material, Duke’s promotion for this project states, “The 110 wind turbines that comprise the Top of the World project are capable of producing enough electricity to power approximately 60,000 homes.”

Check any wind map of the United States and you’ll see that the Florida Everglades is one of the least windy sites in the country and the high plains of east central Wyoming is one of the most windy sites in the country.  So, is it possible that the same size wind farm can service the same number of homes no matter the wind conditions?   If not, who is right?

The U.S. government publishes numbers for the average electricity consumption of American homes under the Energy Information Agency website (EIA).

Using EIA data from their 2011 report, I checked Sugarland’s numbers.  The average Florida home consumes about 1,194 kilowatt-hours per month.  In order for Sugarland’s 200-megawatt wind farm to supply this much electricity for 60,000 Florida homes, the turbine would have to turn 49 percent of the day.

That means the wind would have to blow 49 percent of the day at just the right speed, not too slow, not too fast and ideally, unless we like doing laundry at 3 a.m., not blow half of that time in the middle of the night.

Duke operates another 4-year old wind farm not far from the newly completed Casper, Wyoming farm.  The 4-year old farm they claim produces 37 percent of the time.  I doubt the veracity of their 37 percent, but let’s assume it is accurate.  From my calculations above, it takes 49 percent for a 200-megawatt wind farm to power 60,000 average Florida homes.

Therefore, even a wind farm in the windy high plains of Wyoming, producing 37 percent of the day cannot make Sugarland’s claim true.  This is a far cry from the calm winds of Florida’s Everglades.

Fact is, the wind companies are getting by with murder.  They are allowed by eager politicians and a handful of agenda-driven groups to flippantly throw out numbers that have no basis in scientific fact.  They don’t produce facts, because they don’t have to.  Wind is in vogue and the uninformed but trusting public is not getting the data to make informed decisions about wind’s appropriate use.

David Baumann is a research associate for the American Institue for Economic Research (AIER) based in Great Barrington.  He has written extensively about energy and environmental issues. He is also a board memeber of Green Berkshires, a Great Barrington-based environmental group that opposes wind turbines.

(Full article here)



Tags: , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: