About the Post

Author Information

From WUWT — Blaming Nature for poor climate model performance

Anthony Watts — WUWT — March 7, 2013

There’s not much I can say about this quote from the Washington Post’s Joel Achenbach as it stands on its own quite well.

The context of this quote is article on the bust of a forecast that was to be “snowquester”. You can cut the disappointment in the air with a steak knife. Achenbach muses:

 

Still, I blame the storm more than I blame the computer models. The models are pretty good. It’s Nature that messed this up.

I hope he escapes from his alternate reality soon, people must be looking for him.

Full story here:http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/achenblog/wp/2013/03/07/forecasts-and-probabilities/

h/t to Willis E.

UPDATE: Some people think he was being sarcastic or humorous. For example, from this part:

“I thought the forecast for Snowquester was pretty good, as total busts and epic fiascos go.” is clear as day, but I’ll translate for you:  The forecasters gave it a good shot, but it wasn’t good enough.  It was a total bust.

But there is also this:

The models in this case predicted serious snow in the I-95 corridor, but the storm “underperformed,” and didn’t drop snow intensely enough and consistently enough to cool down the warm layer of the atmosphere and the warm ground in the urban areas.

The storm “underperformed”.   Continue reading, here….

Tags: , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: