About the Post

Author Information

Overwhelming Evidence Of Data Tampering At NASA

Real Science

In 1961, there was 100% consensus that the Earth was cooling

ScreenHunter_343 Feb. 23 06.21

ScreenHunter_344 Feb. 23 06.21

SCIENTISTS AGREE WORLD IS COLDER – But Climate Experts Meeting Here Fail to Agree on Reasons for Change – View Article – NYTimes.com

In 1978, NOAA published this graph of global temperatures, showing 0.4C cooling from 1958-1960 and 0.7C cooling from 1958-1976

ScreenHunter_348 Feb. 23 06.51

ScreenHunter_333 Feb. 22 23.08

This cooling agreed with other studies done at the time.

ScreenHunter_350 Feb. 23 06.55

journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0493(1978)106<0755%3AGTVSMA>2.0.CO%3B2

But NASA’s current global temperature graph doesn’t show any cooling around 1960

Fig.A (13)

Fig.A.gif (656×446)

The next graph overlays NOAA 1978 in red on the same section of NASA. You can see that NASA has deleted the unanimously agreed upon late 1950’s warmth and much of the 1970’s cold.

ScreenHunter_342 Feb. 23 06.19

As late as 1981, NASA’s James Hansen knew about this cooling

ScreenHunter_347 Feb. 23 06.49ScreenHunter_346 Feb. 23 06.49

pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

The National Academy Of Sciences knew about this cooling

ScreenHunter_352 Feb. 23 07.01

https://ia801806.us.archive.org/7/items/understandingcli00unit/understandingcli00unit.pdf

BdmQ8nVCYAAVfJ1

ScreenHunter_351 Feb. 23 06.59

War of the Weathers – View Article – NYTimes.com

NCAR knew about this cooling

ScreenHunter_353 Feb. 23 07.03

denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdf

At…

View original post 72 more words

2 Comments on “Overwhelming Evidence Of Data Tampering At NASA”

  1. sandcanyongal February 24, 2014 at 12:25 am #

    I live in Tehachapi, CA and this is the 3rd year of drought. Where can I read the peer reviewed report?

    • Donna Quixote February 24, 2014 at 7:32 am #

      Peer-reviewed is greatly over-hyped. All peer-reviewed means is that you presented your research to a bunch of like-minded individuals and they all did a quick run through so that they could put their stamp of ‘peer-reviewed’ on it. In todays world of corrupt science, it means nothing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: